On the list of founding ideas of our method of government is "one man, one vote." The implication is always that every single person will get a single vote in every single election knowing that each and every vote will have a similar potential impact on the end result of the election as another individual vote.
The implication is usually that, in a good community, absolutely no person is ever going to be refused their right to that vote knowing that all will certainly be in a position to and can willingly participate in the freedom of voting for his or her chosen officials unhampered, publicly and eagerly.
Now, right away we can think of exceptions to how this principle works out in reality that might cause us to doubt the validity of the "one man, one vote" system. But we should not let that happen. Because despite these kinks in the system, the democracy of the election system is still fundamentally intact.
When this thing that has often been called "The Great American Experiment" got underway, our system of voting, elections and the rule of the people was virtually untried at a national scale such as it was envisioned by the founding fathers.
A great deal of the actual terminology which is so graceful inside much of our foundation documents like the Constitution and also the Declaration of Independence read just like philosophical treatises instead of writings grounded inside a hard fought consciousness of actuality.
But in a way, that's a good thing. Yes, the authors of these documents were philosophers of their time. And yes, what they were describing in their vision of how this great new country would function was theoretical and based on political theory drawn from historical sources rather than immediate historical precedent.
But we only have to look at the outcome to admire that it's a good thing that the founding fathers were wiser than they were practical.
We as a citizens were not too small to live up to the high expectations of our the framers of the constitution. Over the decades, amendments to the constitution were implemented, legal precedents were made and social attitudes changed so that a lot more of the nation's citizenry gained the identical rights that all should have, to be in a position to vote in the elections of their country.
As these improvements to the original founding documents were implemented, phenomenal changes have came about that offer concrete proof that the vision of the fore fathers was indeed a thing that may well be a reality and not merely the philosophical musings of an informed few.
About the most evident social changes which has come together with the legal recognition of the legal rights of minorities and women to take part in the system is that the make-up of the us government has changed considerably and that for the better.
The 3 branches of government today can be nearly unrecognizable within the limited world view that came out on top when the country was created.
But today it is usual inside any state within the union to view black mayors, women in congressional seats or within the governor's mansions dealing with all those obligations with the identical knowledge and logic that male leaders tried to display in previous decades.
These alterations have brought about a positive effect not just on the fairness of the way the government works but in the sense of enfranchisement almost all individuals feel for the affairs of the people.
Indeed, because we now see women, Hispanics, African American citizens and people of all colour and persuasion serving honorably in authority, our policies are more equitable and we're very much nearer to having a government that genuinely does represent the populace of the people.
Now we stand at an occasion when we could also see a lady or an African American in the highest workplace across the country, the Presidency of the US.
And if that happens, we will see one more institution conform to the vision of the founding fathers where every citizen can participate at any level just as every citizen gets one vote. - 20763
The implication is usually that, in a good community, absolutely no person is ever going to be refused their right to that vote knowing that all will certainly be in a position to and can willingly participate in the freedom of voting for his or her chosen officials unhampered, publicly and eagerly.
Now, right away we can think of exceptions to how this principle works out in reality that might cause us to doubt the validity of the "one man, one vote" system. But we should not let that happen. Because despite these kinks in the system, the democracy of the election system is still fundamentally intact.
When this thing that has often been called "The Great American Experiment" got underway, our system of voting, elections and the rule of the people was virtually untried at a national scale such as it was envisioned by the founding fathers.
A great deal of the actual terminology which is so graceful inside much of our foundation documents like the Constitution and also the Declaration of Independence read just like philosophical treatises instead of writings grounded inside a hard fought consciousness of actuality.
But in a way, that's a good thing. Yes, the authors of these documents were philosophers of their time. And yes, what they were describing in their vision of how this great new country would function was theoretical and based on political theory drawn from historical sources rather than immediate historical precedent.
But we only have to look at the outcome to admire that it's a good thing that the founding fathers were wiser than they were practical.
We as a citizens were not too small to live up to the high expectations of our the framers of the constitution. Over the decades, amendments to the constitution were implemented, legal precedents were made and social attitudes changed so that a lot more of the nation's citizenry gained the identical rights that all should have, to be in a position to vote in the elections of their country.
As these improvements to the original founding documents were implemented, phenomenal changes have came about that offer concrete proof that the vision of the fore fathers was indeed a thing that may well be a reality and not merely the philosophical musings of an informed few.
About the most evident social changes which has come together with the legal recognition of the legal rights of minorities and women to take part in the system is that the make-up of the us government has changed considerably and that for the better.
The 3 branches of government today can be nearly unrecognizable within the limited world view that came out on top when the country was created.
But today it is usual inside any state within the union to view black mayors, women in congressional seats or within the governor's mansions dealing with all those obligations with the identical knowledge and logic that male leaders tried to display in previous decades.
These alterations have brought about a positive effect not just on the fairness of the way the government works but in the sense of enfranchisement almost all individuals feel for the affairs of the people.
Indeed, because we now see women, Hispanics, African American citizens and people of all colour and persuasion serving honorably in authority, our policies are more equitable and we're very much nearer to having a government that genuinely does represent the populace of the people.
Now we stand at an occasion when we could also see a lady or an African American in the highest workplace across the country, the Presidency of the US.
And if that happens, we will see one more institution conform to the vision of the founding fathers where every citizen can participate at any level just as every citizen gets one vote. - 20763
About the Author:
The Caribbean has many good politicians who use the principle of 'one man, one vote' as their ultimate guide when looking voters support. One such person is Asot Michael. He is one of the most caring Caribbean politicians. Visit Asot Michael Site.
0 comments
Post a Comment